0%
Many anarchist organizations are banned as extremist. But does the philosophy of anarchism lead directly to radicalism? And how realistic is anarchism in the 21st century in general?
Guest - philosopher Nikolai Gerasimov
Moderator - Anton Kuznetsov
00:00 - Introduction
01:45 - Punks and anarchism
02:27 - Is there a serious philosophy behind anarchism?
04:37 - What is anarchism as a philosophical position
07:23 - How is it possible to replace the state?
09:06 - Too romantic view of human nature?
11:30 - The state is only a stage in the development of mankind
13:33 - Does the implementation of anarchism require radial measures?
15:25 - Even classical anarchism is not extremist
16:30 - What about the radicality of modern anarchism?
17:44 - Noam Chomsky is an anarchist!
18:39 - If an anarchist, then does it mean left?
20:19 - Non-leftist anarchists
22:30 - Anarcho-capitalists and the free market
23:41 - COMPETITION!
24:55 - Anarcho-fascism
26:05 - Are the tribes in the jungle anarchist?
28:00 - How can you resist global challenges without a state?
32:27 - How anarchists deny expert democracy
34:29 - Dependence of anarchists on the state
38:20 - Anarchism and Libertarianism
39:20 - An anarchist is obliged to go to university
41:07 - Examples of the embodiment of anarchism and Switzerland
43:13 - Anarchism denies empires
46:22 - Should anarchism go against cultural or religious identity?
50:02 - Summary from Mary
Listen to the podcast on the platforms:
Soundcloud | Podcasts Apple | Yandex Music | Castbox
